NAAC

CRITERION 1

CRITERION 2

EXTENDED PROFILE

BEST PRACTICES

HR POLICY MANUAL

AWARDS AND RECOGNITION

ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES

STAKE HOLDERS FEEDBACK

INSTITUTIONAL DISTINCTIVENESS

DISABLED FRIENDLY CAMPUS

CAPACITY BUILDING AND SKILL ENHANCEMENT

INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL AUDIT


CRITERION 2 - Teaching Learning and Evaluation (350)



Key Indicator - 2.1. Student Enrolment and Profile (40)


Metric No.DescriptionWeightage
2.1.1.Enrolment percentage20
2.1.2Percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years20


Key Indicator - 2.2. Student Teacher Ratio (40)


Metric No.DescriptionWeightage
2.2.1.Student – Full time Teacher Ratio
(Data for the latest completed academic year)
40


Key Indicator - 2.3. Teaching- Learning Process (40)


Metric No.DescriptionWeightage
2.3.1.Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing40


Key Indicator - 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (40)


Metric No.DescriptionWeightage
2.4.1.Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years
2.4.1.1 Number of Sanctioned posts / required positions for teaching staff/ full time teachers year wise during the last five years
15
2.4.2.Percentage of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count)
2.4.2.1. Number of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. year wise during the last five years
25


Key Indicator - 2.5. Evaluation Process and Reforms (40)


Metric No.DescriptionWeightage
2.5.1.Mechanism of internal/ external assessment is transparent and the grievance redressal system is time- bound and efficient40


Key Indicator - 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome (90)


Metric No.DescriptionWeightage
2.6.1.Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and attainment of POs and COs are evaluated45
2.6.2.Pass percentage of Students during last five years
2.6.2.1. Number of final year students who passed the university examination year wise during the last five years
45


Key Indicator - 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (60)


Metric No.DescriptionWeightage
2.7.1.Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process.60